PAPER: "Adapting Recommendation Diversity to Openness to Experience: A Study of Human Behaviour"
Recommender systems offer items for a user to try or buy based on what is known about their previous preferences or behaviours. Often these recommendations are presented as a list of items. Historically, the emphasis has been on ensuring that items are useful to the user. More recently, the need for diverse recommendations has been recognized by the recommender systems community. There is some consensus that personality is a key aspect to consider when injecting novelty and diversity into recommendations, since attitudes towards new or diverse experiences vary considerably amongst users. Such a recommender system would therefore require a model which accurately describes the personality of users. The trait model from Psychology is a fitting candidate for this. It describes a user's personality by scores on several dimensions, called traits, which are measured via validated self-report questionnaires. Among trait models, the Five Factor Model (FFM, also known as the Big 5 model) has
been shown to have excellent reliability in practice.
-------------------------------------------------------
Which is the RIGHT approach to innovate in the Personality Based Recommender Systems Arena?
The same approach to innovate in the Online Dating Industry
== 16PF5 test or similar to assess personality traits and a new method
to calculate similarity between quantized patterns. That is exactly LIFEPROJECT METHOD, ready since 2001!
Personality Based Recommender Systems are the next generation of recommender systems because they perform FAR better than Behavioural ones (past actions and pattern of personal preferences)
That is the only way to improve recommender systems, to include the personality traits of their users.
They need to calculate personality similarity between users but there are different formulas to calculate similarity.
In
case you did not notice, recommender systems are morphing to ..........
compatibility matching engines, as the same used in the Online Dating Industry since years, with low success rates!!! because they mostly use the Big5 to assess personality and the Pearson correlation coefficient to calculate similarity.
Please remember: Personality traits are highly stable in persons over 25 years old to 45 years old.
In compatibility matching methods there are 2 steps:
1) to objectively measure personality traits or other human variables (with the 16PF5 test) without distortion.
2) to calculate compatibility between prospective mates
IPSATIVE
personality tests are OBSOLETE (self-descriptive questionnaires) and
should be discarded: MBTI (PerfectMatch), DISC (ThomasKnowsPeople),
Enneagram (Dopasowani) or other proprietary ipsative tests like the ones
used at Chemistry, ButterfliesAgain, Doskonalapara, PembePanjur,
LittleHint, oneGoodLove and others.
NORMATIVE
personality tests like Big5 versions used at PlentyOfFish, eHarmony , Meetic Affinity, Parship, Be2, True are good for guidance (orientation)
purposes but not good enough for predictive purposes.
"Because
the Big Five groups the more specific primary-level factors, feedback
organized around the five Global Factor scales is more easily
understood. For detailed feedback or predictive purposes, one should
assess the more specific primary factors. Research has shown that more
specific factors like the primary scales of the 16PF Questionnaire
predict actual behavior better than the Big 5 Global Factors. For
example, one extravert (a bold, fearless, high-energy type) may differ
considerably from another (a sweet, warm, sensitive type), depending on
the extraversion-related primary scale score patterns, so deeper
analysis is typically warranted." Extracted from the 16PF5 Manual
Normative tests
can not simply be translated, because you need the norm for that test,
and that norm is actualized each and every time Census Figures are
released
The 16PF5 test is available in
-
English for the United States and the Norm for the United States
(sample of individuals with the same demographic characteristics of the
United States).
- English for Canada and the Norm for Canada (sample of individuals with the same demographic characteristics of Canada)
-
English for the United Kingdom and the Norm for the United Kingdom
(sample of individuals with the same demographic characteristics of the
United Kingdom).
-
English for Australia and the Norm for Australia (sample of individuals
with the same demographic characteristics of Australia).
- French for France and the Norm for France.
- German for Germany and the Norm for Germany.
- Spanish for Spain and the Norm for Spain.
- Italian for Italy and the Norm for Italy.
and
many more "With over 60 years of research and application behind it,
the 16PF5 has become internationally well known and respected, with over
20 different translated versions."
The
output of the 16PF5 test are 16 variables STens (Standard Tens) taking
integer values from 1 to 10. STens divide the score scale into ten
units.
STens
have the advantage that they enable results to be thought of in terms
of bands of scores, rather than absolute raw scores. These bands are
narrow enough to distinguish statistically significant differences
between candidates, but wide enough not to over emphasize minor
differences between candidates.
WorldWide, there are over 5,000 -five thousand- online dating sites
but no one is using the 16PF5 (or similar) to assess personality of its members!
but no one calculates similarity with a quantized pattern comparison method!
but no one can show Compatibility Distribution Curves to each and every of its members!
but no one is scientifically proven!
The only way to revolutionize the Online Dating Industry
is using the 16PF5 normative personality test, available in different
languages to assess personality of members, or a proprietary test with
exactly the same traits of the 16PF5 and expressing compatibility with eight decimals
(needs a quantized pattern comparison method, part of pattern
recognition by cross-correlation, to calculate similarity between
prospective mates.)
High precision in matching algorithms is precisely the key to open the door and leave the infancy of compatibility testing.
It is all about achieving the eighth decimal!
With 8 decimals, you have more precision than any person could achieve by searching on one's own, but the only way to achieve the eighth decimal is using analysis and correlation with quantized patterns.
Without offering the NORMATIVE16PF5 (or similar test measuring exactly
the 16 personality factors) for serious dating, it will be impossible to
innovate and revolutionize the Online Dating Industry
All other proposals are NOISE and perform as placebo.
What comes after Social Networking?
My bet: The Next Big Investment Opportunity on the Internet will be …. Personalization!
Personality
Based Recommender Systems and Strict Personality Based Compatibility
Matching Engines for serious Online Dating with the normative 16PF5
personality test. The market remains enormous!!
No comments:
Post a Comment