Friday, March 6, 2015

Proof of FRAUD from eHarmony

eHarmony hosts the Los Angeles tech community for talks given by top technology experts.
 Finding Love Through Science
PAPER cited there, "A Third of Recently Married Couples Met Online" is biased/failed.
eHarmony delivers matches as a machine gun shooting flowers (good for nothing, useless).

eHarmony, is a 14+ years old obsolete site and a HOAX, based on a big scientific fraud, only sustained by big marketing budget.

The Big Five normative test had been proven/revealed as an incomplete and incorrect model to assess/measure personality of persons.
The Big Five normative test had been replaced by HEXACO or Big Six test.

Facial Analysis is useless for serious dating, see How facial features drive our first impressions
Match To Use Facial Recognition For Better Matches ???

Why Your (IPSATIVE MBTI) Personality Type Doesn't Matter - eHarmony Advice

eHarmony is not Scientifically Proven.
No actual online dating site  is "scientifically proven" because no one can prove its matching algorithm can match prospective partners who will have more stable and satisfying relationships -and very low divorce rates- than couples matched by chance, astrological destiny, personal preferences, searching on one's own, or other technique as the control group in a peer reviewed Scientific Paper for the majority (over 90%) of its members.

Please see also:
eHarmony Japan

eHarmony Mapping Love with Hadoop ???


eHarmony is conducting a big human experiment

Harris Interactive study about eHarmony is also biased
eHarmony to Launch Globalization Initiative; Company Expects Subscriber Base to Grow 40-50% in 2015

Big data dating IS NOT the key to long-lasting romance

Personality Distribution Curves using the NORMATIVE 16PF5

Several times I had challenged eHarmony’s Team, Match’s Team, even PlentyOfFish owners to launch a new compatibility (personality profiling) site, using the normative 16PF test or similar in different languages.
I had also challenged them to show Compatibility Distribution Curves to each and every of its members!

Lack Of Innovation & Decadence can summarize the Online Dating Industry for years.
Online Dating for serious daters does not need to be more social, it needs to be more effective/efficient. It needs to reduce the false positives problem.
I had reviewed over 55 compatibility matching engines intended for serious dating since 2003, when I had discovered "the online dating sound barrier" problem.
C-level executives are cooking barbecues under the water (selling smoke) and not paying attention to latest research from Academics which could be beneficial for the Online Dating Industry.  

The key to long-lasting romance is STRICT PERSONALITY SIMILARITY, but ...
the only way to revolutionize the Online Dating Industry is using the 16PF5 normative personality test, available in different languages to assess personality of members, or a proprietary test with exactly the same traits of the 16PF5 and expressing compatibility with eight decimals (needs a quantized pattern comparison method, part of pattern recognition by cross-correlation, to calculate similarity between prospective mates.)
High precision in matching algorithms is precisely the key to open the door and leave the infancy of compatibility testing.

Please read: The 8 tips to innovate in the Online Dating Industry!
The Online Dating Industry does not need a 10% improvement, a 50% improvement or a 100% improvement. It does need "a 100 times better improvement", not 100% better, 100X better, really an INNOVATION.
The Online Dating Industry needs a very powerful algorithm like the "Teller Ulam design". In this case 100 times more powerful than actual matching algorithms.

LIFEPROJECT METHOD: 100X better than eHarmony, not 100% better, 100 times better!

No comments:

Post a Comment