https://iai.tv/articles/algorithms-we-love-by-auid-1216
No peak for Valentine's day 2019?
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2019/02/no-peak-for-valentines-day-2019.html
Silly silly silly, rubbish GDI Power Book 2019
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2019/02/silly-silly-silly-rubbish-gdi-power.html
WorldWide, there are over 5,000 (five thousand) online dating sites:
- but no one is using the 16PF5 (or similar) to assess personality of its members!
- but no one calculates similarity with a quantized pattern comparison method!
-
but no one can show Compatibility Distribution Curves to each and every
of its members!!! i.e. if you are a man seeking women, to show how
compatible you are with a 20,000,000 women database, and to select a
bunch of 100 women from 20,000,000 women database.
- but no one is scientifically proven! No actual online dating site is
"scientifically proven" because no one can prove its matching algorithm
can match prospective partners who will have more stable and satisfying
relationships (and very low divorce rates) than couples matched by
chance, astrological destiny, personal preferences, searching on one's
own, or other technique as the control group in a peer reviewed
Scientific Paper for the majority (over 90%) of its members.
Very easy to copycat eHarmony, but very difficult to innovate: a 100 times better algorithm than eHarmony.
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2016/10/very-easy-to-copycat-eharmony-but-very.html
The Online Dating Industry needs INNOVATIONS, not more bells and whistles.
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2018/01/mistakes-at-behavioral-economics-of.html
The 8 tips to innovate in the Online Dating Industry!
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2013/12/the-8-tips-to-innovate-in-online-dating.html
https://www.psionline.com/wp-content/uploads/16pf_6th-Edition_Profile-Report_Ella_SAMPLE.pdf
TC article: VCs aren't falling in love with dating startups
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2019/02/tc-article-vcs-arent-falling-in-love.html
Innovations: to take the 16PF test 3 times
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2010/06/innovations-to-take-16pf5-test-3-times.html
If you plan to use/offer the 16PF
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2011/05/if-you-plan-to-useoffer-16pf5.html
Online
Dating sites have very big databases, in the range of 20,000,000
(twenty million) profiles, so the Big Five model or the HEXACO model are
not enough for predictive purposes.
That is why I suggest the 16PF
test instead and another method to calculate similarity.
High precision in matching algorithms is precisely the key to open the door and leave the infancy of compatibility testing.
Without
offering the NORMATIVE 16PF (or similar test measuring exactly the 16
personality factors) for serious dating, it will be impossible to
innovate and revolutionize the Online Dating Industry.
WorldWide, there are over 5,000 (five thousand) online dating sites:
- but no one is using the 16PF (or similar) to assess personality of its members!
- but no one calculates similarity with a quantized pattern comparison method!
- but no one can show Compatibility Distribution Curves to each and every of its members!!!
i.e. if you are a man seeking women, to show how compatible you are
with a 20,000,000 women database, and to select a bunch of 100 women
from 20,000,000 women database.
- but
no one is scientifically proven! No actual online dating site is
"scientifically proven" because no one can prove its matching algorithm
can match prospective partners who will have more stable and satisfying
relationships (and very low divorce rates) than couples matched by
chance, astrological destiny, personal preferences, searching on one's
own, or other technique as the control group in a peer reviewed
Scientific Paper for the majority (over 90%) of its members.
The 8 tips to innovate in the Online Dating Industry!
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2013/12/the-8-tips-to-innovate-in-online-dating.html
https://axcessnews.com/business/tech/big-data-big-business-online-dating-sites_9105/
Psychology professor examines romantic relationships in the age of online dating
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2019/02/psychology-professor-examines-romantic.html
The key to long-lasting romance: COMPATIBILITY
is exactly STRICT PERSONALITY SIMILARITY and not "meet other people with
similar interests or political views".
Big Data use cases at Plenty of Fish ?
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2014/08/big-data-use-cases-at-plenty-of-fish.html
Online
Dating sites have very big databases, in the range of 20,000,000
(twenty million) profiles, so the Big Five model or the HEXACO model are
not enough for predictive purposes. That is why I suggest the 16PF5
test instead and another method to calculate similarity.
High precision in matching algorithms is precisely the key to open the door and leave the infancy of compatibility testing.
Without
offering the NORMATIVE 16PF5 (or similar test measuring exactly the 16
personality factors) for serious dating, it will be impossible to
innovate and revolutionize the Online Dating Industry.
Fernando Ardenghi's List of Firsts:
First person in the World to say the entire Online Dating Industry in 1st World Countries is a HOAX.
First
person in the World to say many Online Dating sites like
eHarmony, PerfectMatch, Chemistry, PlentyOfFish Chemistry
Predictor, MeeticAffinity, Parship, Be2 and others are performing as placebo, like patent medicine.
First person in the World to discover the Online Dating Sound Barrier problem.
First and Only person in the World to solve the Online Dating Sound Barrier problem.
First person in the World to suggest the normative 16PF5 test or similar like 15FQ+ to measure personality of daters instead of ipsative tests like PerfectMatch or Chemistry or other normative less powerful tests like the Big5.
First person in the World to say Online Dating sites should check if women are taking contraceptive pills or other hormonal therapy.
First person in the World to reverse engineering several online dating sites offering compatibility matching methods.
First person in the World to notice Personality Based Recommender Systems are like compatibility matching engines.
First person in the World to suggest Online Dating sites should show Compatibility Distribution Curves to every and each dater.
First person in the World to compile research about Theories of Romantic Relationship Development.
First person in the World to openly say Conferences for the Online Dating Industry like iDate and ODS are rubbish.
Do you think you can innovate and revolutionize the Online Dating Industry without taking into account the above list? No way.
https://techcrunch.com/2019/02/17/its-valentines-day-but-vcs-arent-falling-in-love-with-dating-startups/
"spirit of Valentine’s Day in the air" but ... "No peak for Valentine's day 2019? "
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2019/02/no-peak-for-valentines-day-2019.html
Your Online Dating Site Will Fail (since 2009)
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2011/05/your-online-dating-site-will-fail.html
Stupid Investors' series: Today Coffee Meets Bagel (CMB)
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2015/02/stupid-investors-series-today-coffee.html
I had reviewed over 55
compatibility matching engines intended for serious dating since 2003,
when I had discovered "the online dating sound barrier" problem.
Personality Based Recommender Systems are the next generation of recommender
systems because they perform far better than Behavioural ones (past
actions and pattern of personal preferences)
That is the only way to
improve recommender systems, to include the personality traits of their
users.
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2017/01/paper-comparative-study-of-people-to_14.html
They need to calculate personality similarity between users but
there are different formulas to calculate similarity.
In case you
did not see, recommender systems are morphing to compatibility
matching engines, as the same used in the Online Dating Industry for
years, with low success rates until now because they mostly use the Big Five model to
assess personality and the Pearson correlation coefficient to calculate
similarity.
Please remember: Personality traits are highly stable in persons over 25 years old to 45 years old.
The key to long-lasting romance: COMPATIBILITY
is exactly STRICT PERSONALITY SIMILARITY and not "meet other people with
similar interests or political views".
Which is the RIGHT approach to innovate in the Personality Based Recommender Systems Arena?
The same approach to innovate in the Online Dating Industry
== 16PF5 test or similar to assess personality traits and a new method
to calculate similarity between quantized patterns.
Online
Dating sites have very big databases, in the range of 20,000,000
(twenty million) profiles, so the Big Five model or the HEXACO model are
not enough for predictive purposes. That is why I suggest the 16PF5
test instead and another method to calculate similarity.
High precision in matching algorithms is precisely the key to open the door and leave the infancy of compatibility testing.
Without
offering the NORMATIVE 16PF5 (or similar test measuring exactly the 16
personality factors) for serious dating, it will be impossible to
innovate and revolutionize the Online Dating Industry.
WorldWide, there are over 5,000 (five thousand) online dating sites:
- but no one is using the 16PF5 (or similar) to assess personality of its members!
- but no one calculates similarity with a quantized pattern comparison method!
- but no one can show Compatibility Distribution Curves to each and every of its members!!!
i.e. if you are a man seeking women, to show how compatible you are
with a 20,000,000 women database, and to select a bunch of 100 women
from 20,000,000 women database.
- but
no one is scientifically proven! No actual online dating site is
"scientifically proven" because no one can prove its matching algorithm
can match prospective partners who will have more stable and satisfying
relationships (and very low divorce rates) than couples matched by
chance, astrological destiny, personal preferences, searching on one's
own, or other technique as the control group in a peer reviewed
Scientific Paper for the majority (over 90%) of its members.
The 8 tips to innovate in the Online Dating Industry!
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2013/12/the-8-tips-to-innovate-in-online-dating.html
talking about stupidities done during 2018
https://gallery.mailchimp.com/ebd00fc2aba27fc5788da8f9a/files/af836aa2-4be0-4060-88ad-cf01eafe17f3/GDI_PB2019_alt_2_compressed.pdf
As usual, silly GDI Power Book 2018
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2018/02/as-usual-silly-gdi-power-book-2018.html
The Online Dating Industry does not need a report on the events of the past 12 months.
It does need INNOVATIONS!
Facebook Dating WorldWide launch in 2020? (next year)
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2019/02/when-does-facebooks-dating-app-become.html
"Q&A: Match Group CEO"
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2019/02/q-match-group-ceo.html
article about: "Are online dating sites posting fake profiles to lure subscribers?"
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2019/02/article-about-are-online-dating-sites.html
Novel Artificial Intelligence-based system to counter online dating frauds
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2019/02/novel-artificial-intelligence-based.html
The key to long-lasting romance: COMPATIBILITY
is exactly STRICT PERSONALITY SIMILARITY and not "meet other people with
similar interests or political views".
Online
Dating sites have very big databases, in the range of 20,000,000
(twenty million) profiles, so the Big Five model or the HEXACO model are
not enough for predictive purposes. That is why I suggest the 16PF5
test instead and another method to calculate similarity.
Lack Of Innovation & Decadence can summarize the Online Dating Industry.
C-Level executives are more worried about their golf scores than their company’s long term strategy and innovations.
C-level executives are cooking barbecues under the water (selling smoke) and not paying attention to latest research from Academics which could be beneficial for the Online Dating Industry.
High precision in matching algorithms is precisely the key to open the door and leave the infancy of compatibility testing.
Without
offering the NORMATIVE 16PF5 (or similar test measuring exactly the 16
personality factors) for serious dating, it will be impossible to
innovate and revolutionize the Online Dating Industry.
“Top 45 Top Scientific Papers For The Online Dating Industry”
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2012/02/top-45-scientific-papers-for-online.html
http://www.onlinepersonalswatch.com/internetdatingscience/2012/02/top-45-top-scientific-papers-for-the-online-dating-industry.html
Please remember: Personality traits are highly stable in persons over 25 years old to 45 years old.
WorldWide, there are over 5,000 (five thousand) online dating sites:
- but no one is using the 16PF5 (or similar) to assess personality of its members!
- but no one calculates similarity with a quantized pattern comparison method!
-
but no one can show Compatibility Distribution Curves to each and every
of its members!!! i.e. if you are a man seeking women, to show how
compatible you are with a 20,000,000 women database, and to select a
bunch of 100 women from 20,000,000 women database.
- but no one is scientifically proven! No actual online dating site is
"scientifically proven" because no one can prove its matching algorithm
can match prospective partners who will have more stable and satisfying
relationships (and very low divorce rates) than couples matched by
chance, astrological destiny, personal preferences, searching on one's
own, or other technique as the control group in a peer reviewed
Scientific Paper for the majority (over 90%) of its members.
Very easy to copycat eHarmony, but very difficult to innovate: a 100 times better algorithm than eHarmony.
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2016/10/very-easy-to-copycat-eharmony-but-very.html
The Online Dating Industry needs INNOVATIONS, not more bells and whistles.
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2018/01/mistakes-at-behavioral-economics-of.html
The 8 tips to innovate in the Online Dating Industry!
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2013/12/the-8-tips-to-innovate-in-online-dating.html
https://www.coastmountainnews.com/news/first-comes-tinder-then-marriage-ubc-professor-examines-online-dating/
How accurate is some of the matching software?
The accuracy of matching software is tricky to comment on because some of the biggest players who state they will ‘find your best match’ have been unwilling to cooperate with researchers who want to test their algorithms
The key to long-lasting romance: COMPATIBILITY
is exactly STRICT PERSONALITY SIMILARITY and not "meet other people with
similar interests or political views".
“Top 45 Top Scientific Papers For The Online Dating Industry”
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2012/02/top-45-scientific-papers-for-online.html
http://www.onlinepersonalswatch.com/internetdatingscience/2012/02/top-45-top-scientific-papers-for-the-online-dating-industry.html
Please remember: Personality traits are highly stable in persons over 25 years old to 45 years old.
WorldWide, there are over 5,000 (five thousand) online dating sites:
- but no one is using the 16PF5 (or similar) to assess personality of its members!
- but no one calculates similarity with a quantized pattern comparison method!
-
but no one can show Compatibility Distribution Curves to each and every
of its members!!! i.e. if you are a man seeking women, to show how
compatible you are with a 20,000,000 women database, and to select a
bunch of 100 women from 20,000,000 women database.
- but no one is scientifically proven! No actual online dating site is
"scientifically proven" because no one can prove its matching algorithm
can match prospective partners who will have more stable and satisfying
relationships (and very low divorce rates) than couples matched by
chance, astrological destiny, personal preferences, searching on one's
own, or other technique as the control group in a peer reviewed
Scientific Paper for the majority (over 90%) of its members.
Very easy to copycat eHarmony, but very difficult to innovate: a 100 times better algorithm than eHarmony.
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2016/10/very-easy-to-copycat-eharmony-but-very.html
BBC Future article about Online Dating
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2018/12/bbc-future-article-about-online-dating.html
PAPER "DATA DRIVEN APPROACH TO MATE PREFERENCES"
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2019/01/paper-data-driven-approach-to-mate.html
about GDI Editorial article: Two Psychologists Talk Compatibility Science
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2018/11/about-gdi-editorial-article-two.html
Nearly all of the big dating apps are now owned by Match Group
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2019/02/nearly-all-of-big-dating-apps-are-now.html
