The Online Dating Industry needs innovations but they will come from only one source: the latest discoveries in theories of romantic relationships development with commitment.
I) Several studies showing contraceptive pills users make different mate choices, on average, compared to non-users.
II) People often report partner preferences that are not compatible with their choices in real life.(FORGET Behavioural recommender systems or other system that learns your preferences)
III) Compatibility is all about a high level on personality* similarity* between prospective mates for long term mating with commitment.
*personality measured with a normative test.
*similarity: there are different ways to calculate similarity, it depends on how mathematically is defined.
"Measuring Profile Distance in Online Social Networks"
".... We present a method for comparing user profiles, by measuring the distance between the profiles in metric space"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a3c5/6a3c5f29f746435b4ebc3fcd62cd719b6f6247f4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc971/dc97161139ca2cc4200dcac45ac060576f8d86d2" alt=""
See How LIFEPROJECT METHOD calculates similarity between quantized patterns using an adapted quantum mechanics math equation. All other methods are RUBBISH, because the ensemble of the 16PF5 is: 10E16, big number as All World Population is nearly 7.0 * 10E9 (estimated OCT 2011)
(7.0 * 10E9) / 10E16 == 7.0 * 10E(-7) or 0.7 * 10E(-6) or 0.7 micro part!
All World Population is less than 0.7 micro part of the 16PF5's ensemble.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/092d5/092d5b6ce2501ef0ecc8e4090a55300b6950a3b9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a77b/8a77b325550d684ae6d55ab3033f04180a44aab5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67632/67632538ae75ae913f4e0332d2b8a6583f31c051" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4878/b4878d12daee394d089911a917d0710125a1676f" alt=""
other rubbish paper for the online dating industry:
"A Hybrid Content-Collaborative Reciprocal Recommender for Online Dating"
"We present a new recommender system for online dating. Using a large dataset from a major online dating website, we first show that similar people, as defined by a set of personal attributes, like and dislike similar people and are liked and disliked by similar people. This analysis provides the foundation for our reciprocal content-collaborative recommender approach. The content-based part uses selected user profile features and similarity measure to generate a set of similar users. The collaborative filtering part uses the interactions of the similar users, including the people they like/dislike and are liked/disliked by, to produce reciprocal recommendations....."
is the evolution of "CCR - A Content-Collaborative Reciprocal Recommender for Online Dating"
No comments:
Post a Comment