IJCAI-13, the 23rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence was held in Beijing, China from August 3-9, 2013.
FULL slides from Tutorial: Recommender Systems
personality tests are OBSOLETE (self-descriptive questionnaires) and
should be discarded: MBTI (PerfectMatch), DISC (ThomasKnowsPeople),
Enneagram (Dopasowani) or other proprietary ipsative tests like the ones
used at Chemistry, ButterfliesAgain, Doskonalapara, PembePanjur,
LittleHint, oneGoodLove and others.
personality tests like Big5 versions used at PlentyOfFish, eHarmony, MeeticAffinity, Parship, Be2, True and others, are good for guidance (orientation)
purposes but not good enough for predictive purposes.
the Big Five groups the more specific primary-level factors, feedback
organized around the five Global Factor scales is more easily
understood. For detailed feedback or predictive purposes, one should
assess the more specific primary factors. Research has shown that more
specific factors like the primary scales of the 16PF Questionnaire
predict actual behavior better than the Big 5 Global Factors. For
example, one extravert (a bold, fearless, high-energy type) may differ
considerably from another (a sweet, warm, sensitive type), depending on
the extraversion-related primary scale score patterns, so deeper
analysis is typically warranted." Extracted from the 16PF5 Manual
output of the 16PF5 test are 16 variables STens (Standard Tens) taking
integer values from 1 to 10. STens divide the score scale into ten
have the advantage that they enable results to be thought of in terms
of bands of scores, rather than absolute raw scores. These bands are
narrow enough to distinguish statistically significant differences
between candidates, but wide enough not to over emphasize minor
differences between candidates.
Online Dating sites have very big databases, in the range of 20,000,000
(twenty million) profiles, so the Big 5 model is not enough for
If they use the Big 5 model, the whole precision is less than you could achieve searching by your own!!!
The entire Online Dating Industry for serious daters in 1st World Countries is a HOAX, performing as a Big Online Casino, with a low effectiveness/efficiency level of their matching algorithms (less than 10%), in the same range as searching by your own.
online dating sites offering compatibility matching methods are only
fueled by big marketing budgets and not by serious scientific evidence.
No one (eHarmony, Chemistry, PerfectMatch, PlentyOfFish
Chemistry Predictor, MeeticAffinity, Be2, RewardingLove, Parship, True,
etc) can prove its matching algorithm can match prospective partners who
will have more stable and satisfying relationships than couples matched
by chance, astrological destiny, personal preferences, searching on
one's own, or other technique as the control group in a peer_reviewed
Scientific Paper for the majority (over 90%) of their members.
They are all like placebo, as:
* Actual online dating sites
offering compatibility matching methods, when calculating compatibility
between prospective mates, have less or at least the same precision as
searching on one's own. [in the range of 3 or 4 persons compatible per
1,000 persons screened]
* That is because they use:
a) simplified versions of personality traits, instead of the 16PF5 or similar with the complete inventory (16 variables)
b) inadequate quantitative methods to calculate compatibility between prospective mates.
To solve that problem I propose:
1) the 16PF5 or similar
normative personality test to measure personality of normal persons over
26 years old interested in serious dating.
No actual online dating
site offering compatibility matching methods uses the 16PF5 normative
test available in different languages or similar test.
2) a new quantitative method to calculate compatibility between
prospective mates, based on quantized pattern comparison (part of
pattern recognition by correlation)
The value of my algorithm is to
achieve far more precision than searching on one's own [in the range of 3
persons compatible per 100,000 persons screened, 100 times better than
WorldWide, there are over 5,000 -five thousand- online dating sites
but no one is using the 16PF5 (or similar) to assess personality of its members!
but no one calculates similarity with a quantized pattern comparison method!
but no one can show Compatibility Distribution Curves to each and every of its members!
but no one is scientifically proven!
only way to revolutionize the Online Dating Industry is using the 16PF5
normative personality test, available in different languages to assess
personality of members, or a proprietary test with exactly the same
traits of the 16PF5 and expressing compatibility with eight decimals
(needs a quantized pattern comparison method, part of pattern
recognition by cross-correlation, to calculate similarity between
High precision in matching algorithms is precisely the key to open the door and leave the infancy of compatibility testing.
Personality Based Recommender Systems are the next generation of recommender systems because they perform far better than Behavioural ones (past actions and pattern of personal preferences)
That is the only way to improve recommender systems, to include the personality traits of their users. They need to calculate personality similarity between users but there are different formulas to calculate similarity.
Recommender systems are morphing to ......... compatibility matching engines,
as the same used in the Online Dating Industry since years, with low
success rates, because they mostly use the Big5 to assess personality
and the Pearson correlation coefficient to calculate similarity.
(Personality traits are highly stable in persons over 25 years old to 45 years old)
What comes after the Social Networking wave?
The Next Big Investment Opportunity on the Internet will be .... Personalization!
Personality Based Recommender Systems and Strict Personality
Based Compatibility Matching Engines for serious Online Dating with the
normative 16PF5 personality test.
The market remains enormous!!