Guide to review online dating sites offering compatibility matching methods :
-----A) TEST
A.1) Brain behind the test.
A.2) test? proprietary or commercial / ipsative or normative / validation / reliability, etc
-----B) MATCHING ALGORITHM
B.1) Brain behind matching algorithm.
B.2) the ENSEMBLE (the whole set of different valid possibilities)
B.3) About compatibility.
If compatibility means a high degree of similarity between several variables (religion, education, income, personality, personal preferences, likes and dislikes, etc.) between prospective matesORif compatibility means a mix of similarity and complementarity between variablesORWhat does exactly compatibility mean?
B.4) What does exactly similarity mean? and What does exactly complementarity mean?
B.5) How exactly the compatibility matching method works, specifying main matching equation/ formula (without revealing proprietary information).
E.g.:
"a proprietary Dyadic Adjustment Scale"
"a proprietary multivariate linear regression equation"
"a proprietary multivariate logistic regression equation"
"an adapted quantum mechanics math equation"
B.6) How compatibility results are displayed
E.g.:
* only a number: like 110 (Cybersuitors), 96% (PlentyofFish Chemistry Predictor), 65 (Parship), 92.55033557% +/- 0.00000001% (LPM), etc.
* only a graphic system: like a set of up to five empty/half_full/full hearts icon; a set of up to ten empty/half_full/full squares, a set of semaphores, etc.
* a written report like ThomasKnowsPeople.
B.7) Average number of "compatible real persons" for one person over the entire database.
E.g.:
* 3 or 4 persons high compatible per 1,000 persons
* 3 most compatible persons in a 100,000 persons database,
-----C) DIVORCE RATES
C.1) "Divorce rates" of the couples matched by the compatibility matching method after 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years.
-----D) peer_reviewed Scientifc Paper
Peer_reviewed Scientifc Paper showing the compatibility matching method matches persons who will have more stable and satisfying relationships than couples matched by chance, astrological destiny, personal preferences, searching on one's own, or other typical type of compatibility test (like Wilson & Cousins) as the control group; with low 'divorce rates' (e.g. after 2, 5, 10 years of 'marriage').
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hinge’s CEO says dating isn’t something people should leave up to AI
El CEO de Hinge asegura que la gente no deberÃa dejar las citas en manos de la IA https://www.infobae.com/fortune/2025/06/27/el-ceo-de-hing...
-
The Swiss 16PT is NOT the same as the 16PF5 test. The 16PT is ipsative The 16PF5 is normative That Swiss ipsative 16 PT Personal...
-
The majority of online dating sites never show you prices before you register. ChristianCafe, a 15 years old company in the Online Dating I...
-
POF agreed to pay the fine after the CRTC alleged emails sent to members of the dating service did not feature a proper unsubscribe button....
No comments:
Post a Comment