Fake profiles at Wamba / part 2

Wamba is like a copycat of Badoo, but worse. The site is really awful, with fake profiles. I suspect they had bought a bunch of profiles to fill the initial database.
Some Argentinean cities with misspellings:
Cordova instead of Córdoba.
Rosary instead of Rosario.
Olives instead of Olivos.
The site is in English instead of Spanish.
Some profiles have descriptions in Russian.
Here are some screenshots.

Nobody is going to pay for using Wamba, here, in South America. Wamba is not going to get traction because Badoo is better and free (for social dating / casual dating).

Please read also
fake profiles for online dating sites 
Badoo mysteries (part 1)
Badoo mysteries (part 2)
Badoo mysteries (part 3) 
Badoo Brazil / Badoo Brasil 

How to detect fake profiles in Argentina & Uruguay

3 big South American failed proposals. 

The White Label Dating enigma / part 3

The White Label Dating enigma / part 2
The White Label Dating enigma / part 1

Mamboo review

Mamboo review / Saturday 10th at night / In one sentence: Mamboo is worse than Badoo and are full of Philippines.
If you created a male profile at Singlesnet, you received 3 fake messages from women. When you tried to read them, the subscribe screen appears.

If you create a male profile at Badoo, you receive 4 fake messages from women offline. Those messages disappear when you try to read them.

I created a male profile from Argentina at Mamboo and received winks from online women from Philippines. I began to chat with them and they had denied they had sent me those winks. It seems when you first register at Mamboo your profile is listed in #1 rank in your location, so when a woman visits it, an automatic wink is sent to you, that is a dirty trick from Mamboo to encourage persons to chat.

Chat runs very fast. Faster than Badoo and Yangutu (at least in my computer)

At Mamboo you can only pay by credit cards and PayPal. They are dead (in Latin American countries) because daters will prefer to pay via SMS using their cell phones in their local currencies as in Badoo or Yangutu.
The "VIP-status is a collection of the best services for the most comfortable communication on the Dating service" It costs 5 coins!!!
To "Raise up your profile" costs 1 coin.
1 coin == 1.04 Euros

Mamboo has video chat features and they also offer to write a blog inside your profile, but you need to be verified. You enter your phone number to receive a code, then the R icon in green appears in your profile.
Mamboo is only in English and German languages.
In one sentence: Mamboo is worse than Badoo and are full of Philippines.

UPDATE about Yangutu

I agree that Yangutu is better than Badoo and also it is cheaper [for fun dating, for entertainment purposes, not for serious dating], but Yangutu has nearly no traffic. Nobody is using it. The upper bar is nearly the same as 2 days ago. At Badoo, it is continually moving, changing with new persons online. Alexa shows Yangutu has no traffic, so when one person checks/reads your profile, Yangutu sends an instant email to the email address you had used to register, so you can click the name of the person who reviewed your profile and automatically you are logged in and you can begin to chat. (You do not need to enter your username and password)

 
The chat runs quite slow in my computer and it causes high resources consumption (The majority of South Americans use Firefox 6.0.2 with Adblock Plus Add-on, Windows XP service pack 2 operating system with 512M of RAM, AVG antivirus free edition 2011 and 1Mbps Internet Broadband. If you want to test how something performs you should use than combo for South American countries).
Also the compatibility matching method Yangutu offers is a HOAX, they do not have any scientific proof. Yangutu's matching algorithm can not prove its matching algorithm can match prospective partners who will have more stable and satisfying relationships than couples matched by chance, astrological destiny, personal preferences, searching on one's own, or other technique as the control group in a peer_reviewed Scientific Paper.
Friday 9th 06:30 PM in Argentina is Saturday 10th 01:30 AM in Moscow and here are fresh screenshots.

 

Yangutu review PART 2 of 2

In a previous post I had said "Yangutu, the science-based online dating site" is a HOAX

It is a HOAX, because it is (only based on) an ipsative personality assessment instrument, not a normative one.


Here you can see screenshots of how test result and soulmates are shown.

Yangutu is an improved copycat of Badoo, but nearly nobody uses it. In more than 14 hours, the upper bar had minor changes as this screenshot shows.


It runs slower than Badoo on my computer and I could not chat with anybody.
Even not with the founder, who seems to be 24 hours online, because at Yangutu there is NO indicator to tell you if a person is Online or Offline as in Badoo that has a green light.

There are some bugs on the site that sends you to an error screen.

Yangutu, a copycat of Badoo PART 1 of 2

Yangutu, a copycat of Badoo, but improved, although nearly nobody uses it.

They claim:" Why Yangutu is the best way to find the right person for you?
Seek out your soulmate on Yangutu, the science-based online dating site. (Is there any proof?) We use a combination of statistical data with psychological factors to form a unique matching algorithm, which helps people build good-hearted relationships. Unlike other services, who work solely with unprovable psychological compatibility, Yangutu is based on the fully objective statistical probability of a good match"

It is a HOAX, because it is (only based on) an ipsative instrument (... The test reveals the prevalent temperament type, sanguine, choleric, phlegmatic or melancholic....).

I would love to see Compatibility Matching Distribution Curves with each and every prospective mate like the ones for LIFEPROJECT METHOD
I use "personality similarity distribution" for LIFEPROJECT METHOD because it offers strict personality similarity using the normative 16PF5 personality test and the quantitative method I had invented but other proposals should use "Compatibility Distribution"

WorldWide, there are over 5,000 online dating sites,
but no one is using the 16PF5 to assess personality of its members!
but no one calculates similarity with a quantized pattern comparison method!
but no one can show Compatibility Distribution Curves to each and every of its members!
but no one is scientifically proven!