"Respondent rationale for neither agreeingnordisagreeing: Person and item contributors to middle category endorsement intent on Likert personality indicators"
Abstract: The current study examines intentions behind middle category endorsement in personality assessment, and investigates person and item antecedents to these intentions. Participants verbally explained their responses to 100 personality items and completed personality, self-concept clarity, and cognitive ability measures. Talked through items were scaled with respect to clarity, complexity, and need for contextualization. Verbal protocols suggest that the predominant respondent orientation when selecting the Likert middle category is it depends. Candidate item and person antecedents indicate that middle category endorsement intentions are more closely attributable to item rather than respondent characteristics. These findings suggest that consecutive integer scoring algorithms may result in personality scale attenuation, particularly with instruments that contain indicators reflecting an ambiguous or unspecified context.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hinge’s CEO says dating isn’t something people should leave up to AI
El CEO de Hinge asegura que la gente no debería dejar las citas en manos de la IA https://www.infobae.com/fortune/2025/06/27/el-ceo-de-hing...
-
El CEO de Hinge asegura que la gente no debería dejar las citas en manos de la IA https://www.infobae.com/fortune/2025/06/27/el-ceo-de-hing...
-
I strongly agree with the paper "A Survey of Accuracy Evaluation Metrics of Recommendation Tasks" when it says " ... conside...
-
The Swiss 16PT is NOT the same as the 16PF5 test. The 16PT is ipsative The 16PF5 is normative That Swiss ipsative 16 PT Personal...

No comments:
Post a Comment