Friday, October 6, 2017

AGAIN the obsolete Big Five normative test.





Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Does Not Predict (SELF)-Reported Behavioral Tendencies
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0956797617716929
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0956797617716929/suppl_file/KosinskiSupplementalMaterial.pdf
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0956797617716929/suppl_file/Kosinski_Open_Practices_Disclosure.pdf
TERRIBLE BIG DISTORTION!!!

from same author of
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2012/08/featured-paper-personality-and-patterns.html
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2013/03/paper-private-traits-and-attributes-are.html
BI article: A Stanford professor thinks AI will be able to detect your politics, IQ, and sexuality — but not everyone agrees
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2017/09/bi-article-stanford-professor-thinks-ai.html
and
Finally the perfect dating algorithm? Of course NOT, Big Five test is OBSOLETE.
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2017/02/finally-perfect-dating-algorithm-of.html

The Big Five normative personality test is obsolete, it has been proven as an incomplete and incorrect model of personality.
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2017/09/online-dating-pioneer-algorithmic.html
The HEXACO (a.k.a. Big Six) is another oversimplification. 


Online Dating sites have very big databases, in the range of 20,000,000 (twenty million) profiles, so the Big Five model or the HEXACO model are not enough for predictive purposes. That is why I suggest the 16PF5 test instead and another method to calculate similarity.

High precision in matching algorithms is precisely the key to open the door and leave the infancy of compatibility testing.
Without offering the NORMATIVE 16PF5 (or similar test measuring exactly the 16 personality factors) for serious dating, it will be impossible to innovate and revolutionize the Online Dating Industry.


The Online Dating Industry does not need a 10% improvement, a 50% improvement or a 100% improvement. It does need "a 100 times better improvement"

All other proposals are NOISE and perform as placebo
 

No comments:

Post a Comment