https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/22/seven-reasons-not-to-trust-facebook-to-play-cupid/
"If you feel moved to text an up-front marriage proposal — feeling 100% confident in Facebook’s data scientists’ prowess in reading the social media tea leaves and plucking your future life partner out of the mix"
If Facebook received help of former eHarmony's team?
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2018/05/tc-article-facebook-hired-eharmonys.html
Facebook Dating, via Noticias Caracol
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2018/09/facebook-dating-via-noticias-caracol.html
Chief Scientist At eHarmony Cavorts With The ... Facebook
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2018/01/about-chief-scientist-at-eharmony.html
My
bet: He is copycatting WATSON IBM, in same manner as Dr. Galen
Buckwalter did (Soulmates.ai), but Buckwalter used the HEXACO model of
personality (BIG FIVE, or OCEAN is obsolete now)
Personality Based Recommender Systems are the next generation of recommender
systems because they perform far better than Behavioural ones (past
actions and pattern of personal preferences)
That is the only way to
improve recommender systems, to include the personality traits of their
users.
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2017/01/paper-comparative-study-of-people-to_14.html
They need to calculate personality similarity between users but
there are different formulas to calculate similarity.
In case you
did not see, recommender systems are morphing to compatibility
matching engines, as the same used in the Online Dating Industry for
years, with low success rates until now because they mostly use the Big Five model to
assess personality and the Pearson correlation coefficient to calculate
similarity.
Please remember: Personality traits are highly stable in persons over 25 years old to 45 years old.
The key to long-lasting romance: COMPATIBILITY
is exactly STRICT PERSONALITY SIMILARITY and not "meet other people with
similar interests or political views".
Which is the RIGHT approach to innovate in the Personality Based Recommender Systems Arena?
The same approach to innovate in the Online Dating Industry
== 16PF5 test or similar to assess personality traits and a new method
to calculate similarity between quantized patterns.
Online
Dating sites have very big databases, in the range of 20,000,000
(twenty million) profiles, so the Big Five model or the HEXACO model are
not enough for predictive purposes. That is why I suggest the 16PF5
test instead and another method to calculate similarity.
High precision in matching algorithms is precisely the key to open the door and leave the infancy of compatibility testing.
Without
offering the NORMATIVE 16PF5 (or similar test measuring exactly the 16
personality factors) for serious dating, it will be impossible to
innovate and revolutionize the Online Dating Industry.
WorldWide, there are over 5,000 (five thousand) online dating sites:
- but no one is using the 16PF5 (or similar) to assess personality of its members!
- but no one calculates similarity with a quantized pattern comparison method!
- but no one can show Compatibility Distribution Curves to each and every of its members!!!
i.e. if you are a man seeking women, to show how compatible you are
with a 20,000,000 women database, and to select a bunch of 100 women
from 20,000,000 women database.
- but
no one is scientifically proven! No actual online dating site is
"scientifically proven" because no one can prove its matching algorithm
can match prospective partners who will have more stable and satisfying
relationships (and very low divorce rates) than couples matched by
chance, astrological destiny, personal preferences, searching on one's
own, or other technique as the control group in a peer reviewed
Scientific Paper for the majority (over 90%) of its members.
The 8 tips to innovate in the Online Dating Industry!
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2013/12/the-8-tips-to-innovate-in-online-dating.html
https://twitter.com/wongmjane/status/1040686331070898176
https://twitter.com/wongmjane/status/1040685041292963840
http://socialbarrel.com/facebook-dating-will-suggest-matches-from-dating-groups/117307/
https://www.adslzone.net/2018/09/15/facebook-dating-recopilacion-datos/
It seems NO INNOVATION AT ALL, the same as any online dating site!
The Online Dating Industry needs INNOVATIONS, not more bells and whistles.
What is important in attracting people to one another may not be important in making couples happy.
Compatibility is all about a high level on personality similarity between prospective mates for long term mating with commitment, and not meet other people with similar interests or political views.
Facebook is refining Facebook Dating feature (via Ms. Jane Manchun Wong)
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2018/08/facebook-is-refining-facebook-dating.html
Match Group prepares for battle with Facebook
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2018/07/match-group-prepares-for-battle-with.html
Match Group is continually claiming "Facebook Is No Threat to Match Group"
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2018/07/continually-claiming-facebook-is-no.html
Perhaps Facebook is copycatting Tinder and Bumble, with some minor improvement with the help of former eHarmony's team,
and perhaps Facebook dating app will be free in order to erode Match Group dating sites.
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2018/05/tc-article-facebook-hired-eharmonys.html
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1809/1809.03047.pdf
PAPER "A new similarity measure using Bhattacharyya coefficient
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2015/03/paper-new-similarity-measure-using.html
Please see: "How to calculate personality similarity between users"
Short answer: the key is the ENSEMBLE! (the whole set of different valid possibilities)
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2013/03/how-to-calculate-personality-similarity.html
Worldwide
there are over 5,000 online dating sites, no one uses the 16PF5, no one
is scientifically proven yet, and no one can show you compatibility distribution curves,
i.e. if you are a man seeking women, to show how compatible you are
with a 20,000,000 women database, and to select a bunch of 100 women
from 20,000,000 women database.
What comes after the Social Networking wave?
The Next Big Investment Opportunity on the Internet will be .... Personalization!
Personality Based Recommender Systems and Strict Personality Based Compatibility Matching Engines for serious Online Dating with the normative 16PF5 personality test.
The 8 tips to innovate in the Online Dating Industry!
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2013/12/the-8-tips-to-innovate-in-online-dating.html
And please remember: Personality Based Recommender Systems are the next generation of recommender
systems because they perform far better than Behavioural ones (past
actions and pattern of personal preferences)
That is the only way to
improve recommender systems, to include the personality traits of their
users.
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2017/01/paper-comparative-study-of-people-to_14.html
They need to calculate personality similarity between users but
there are different formulas to calculate similarity.
In case you
did not see, recommender systems are morphing to compatibility
matching engines, as the same used in the Online Dating Industry for
years, with low success rates until now because they mostly use the Big Five model to
assess personality and the Pearson correlation coefficient to calculate
similarity.
Please remember: Personality traits are highly stable in persons over 25 years old to 45 years old.
The key to long-lasting romance: COMPATIBILITY
is exactly STRICT PERSONALITY SIMILARITY and not "meet other people with
similar interests or political views".
Which is the RIGHT approach to innovate in the Personality Based Recommender Systems Arena?
The same approach to innovate in the Online Dating Industry
== 16PF5 test or similar to assess personality traits and a new method
to calculate similarity between quantized patterns.
Online
Dating sites have very big databases, in the range of 20,000,000
(twenty million) profiles, so the Big Five model or the HEXACO model are
not enough for predictive purposes. That is why I suggest the 16PF5
test instead and another method to calculate similarity.
The results are, as you might expect, absolute nonsense.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/tech/scientists-develop-ai-bot-can-13242479
Watson IBM and Amazon AI solutions, pitfalls.
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2018/07/watson-ibm-and-amazon-ai-solutions.html
Viola.AI .. but Match failed with Amazon Alexa
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2018/01/violaai-but-match-failed-with-amazon.html
http://www.onlinepersonalswatch.com/news/2018/01/match-pulls-its-alexa-skill-giving-controversial-dating-tips.html
and Chief Scientist At eHarmony Cavorts With The ... Facebook
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2018/01/about-chief-scientist-at-eharmony.html
My bet: He is copycatting WATSON IBM, in same manner as Dr. Galen Buckwalter did (Soulmates.ai), but Buckwalter used the HEXACO model of personality (BIG FIVE, or OCEAN is obsolete now)
Personality Based Recommender Systems are the next generation of recommender
systems because they perform far better than Behavioural ones (past
actions and pattern of personal preferences)
That is the only way to
improve recommender systems, to include the personality traits of their
users.
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2017/01/paper-comparative-study-of-people-to_14.html
They need to calculate personality similarity between users but
there are different formulas to calculate similarity.
In case you
did not see, recommender systems are morphing to compatibility
matching engines, as the same used in the Online Dating Industry for
years, with low success rates until now because they mostly use the Big Five model to
assess personality and the Pearson correlation coefficient to calculate
similarity.
Please remember: Personality traits are highly stable in persons over 25 years old to 45 years old.
The key to long-lasting romance: COMPATIBILITY
is exactly STRICT PERSONALITY SIMILARITY and not "meet other people with
similar interests or political views".
Which is the RIGHT approach to innovate in the Personality Based Recommender Systems Arena?
The same approach to innovate in the Online Dating Industry
== 16PF5 test or similar to assess personality traits and a new method
to calculate similarity between quantized patterns.
Online
Dating sites have very big databases, in the range of 20,000,000
(twenty million) profiles, so the Big Five model or the HEXACO model are
not enough for predictive purposes. That is why I suggest the 16PF5
test instead and another method to calculate similarity.
High precision in matching algorithms is precisely the key to open the door and leave the infancy of compatibility testing.
Without
offering the NORMATIVE 16PF5 (or similar test measuring exactly the 16
personality factors) for serious dating, it will be impossible to
innovate and revolutionize the Online Dating Industry.
WorldWide, there are over 5,000 (five thousand) online dating sites:
- but no one is using the 16PF5 (or similar) to assess personality of its members!
- but no one calculates similarity with a quantized pattern comparison method!
- but no one can show Compatibility Distribution Curves to each and every of its members!!!
i.e. if you are a man seeking women, to show how compatible you are
with a 20,000,000 women database, and to select a bunch of 100 women
from 20,000,000 women database.
- but
no one is scientifically proven! No actual online dating site is
"scientifically proven" because no one can prove its matching algorithm
can match prospective partners who will have more stable and satisfying
relationships (and very low divorce rates) than couples matched by
chance, astrological destiny, personal preferences, searching on one's
own, or other technique as the control group in a peer reviewed
Scientific Paper for the majority (over 90%) of its members.
The 8 tips to innovate in the Online Dating Industry!
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2013/12/the-8-tips-to-innovate-in-online-dating.html
https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/11/i-watched-hbos-tinder-shaming-doc-swiped-so-you-dont-have-to/
The journalist who provoked the wrath of Tinder is back
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2018/09/the-journalist-who-provoked-wrath-of.html
Please see Forbes article: 'Black Mirror' Recap: 'Hang The DJ' Satirizes Dating In The Digital Age
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2018/01/forbes-article-black-mirror-recap-hang.html
about article: How to Build the Netflix of Love
https://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2018/01/about-article-how-to-build-netflix-of.html
"Mr
Right or Ms Right" or "the one" or "your soulmate" or a "perfect match"
does not exist! It will only exist a pool of compatible persons, not
more than that.
No online dating site can promise you to find "the one" or "your soulmate" or a "perfect match".
Moreover
the person you are looking for does not exist or if it exist, he/she
does not want to meet you because your are not compatible.
The key to long-lasting romance: COMPATIBILITY
is exactly STRICT PERSONALITY SIMILARITY and not "meet other people with
similar interests or political views".
WorldWide, there are over 5,000 (five thousand) online dating sites:
- but no one is using the 16PF5 (or similar) to assess personality of its members!
- but no one calculates similarity with a quantized pattern comparison method!
- but no one can show Compatibility Distribution Curves to each and every of its members!!!
i.e. if you are a man seeking women, to show how compatible you are
with a 20,000,000 women database, and to select a bunch of 100 women
from 20,000,000 women database.
- but
no one is scientifically proven! No actual online dating site is
"scientifically proven" because no one can prove its matching algorithm
can match prospective partners who will have more stable and satisfying
relationships (and very low divorce rates) than couples matched by
chance, astrological destiny, personal preferences, searching on one's
own, or other technique as the control group in a peer reviewed
Scientific Paper for the majority (over 90%) of its members.
The 8 tips to innovate in the Online Dating Industry!
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2013/12/the-8-tips-to-innovate-in-online-dating.html
https://www.dallasnews.com/business/technology/2018/09/12/even-companies-face-relationship-drama-match-groups-bumpy-road-top-online-dating
Aegis ups Match target to 19% upside
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3389734-aegis-ups-match-target-19-percent-upside
Tinder’s CEO Has Disappointing Victim-Blamey Dating Tips for Women
https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/kz5aev/tinders-ceo-has-disappointing-victim-blamey-dating-tips-for-women
Please notice MTCH is mostly owned by IAC and of course IAC is controlled by one man, Mr. Barry Diller (76).
Investors should be cognizant if he is severely ill (lung cancer?) because he manages IAC like a Godfather. Perhaps IAC / MTCH can collapse if he passes away.
MTCH has also big debt in the range of USD 1.3 Billion.
The journalist who provoked the wrath of Tinder is back
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com/2018/09/the-journalist-who-provoked-wrath-of.html
